Naive Decision Making by T. W. Körner

By T. W. Körner

How may still one decide on the simplest eating place to devour in? Can one quite become profitable at playing? Or expect the long run? Naive choice Making offers the mathematical foundation for making daily judgements, which my frequently be in line with little or no or doubtful info. Professor Körner takes the reader on an relaxing trip via many facets of mathematical determination making, with relatable observations, anecdotes and quotations. themes contain likelihood, records, Arrow's theorem, video game idea and Nash equilibrium. Readers also will achieve loads of perception into arithmetic as a rule and the function it may play inside of society. appropriate for people with trouble-free calculus, this publication is perfect as a supplementary textual content for undergraduate classes in likelihood, online game idea and selection making. attractive and fascinating, it is going to additionally entice all these of a mathematical brain. to assist realizing, many workouts are integrated, with options to be had on-line.

Show description

Read Online or Download Naive Decision Making PDF

Similar decision-making & problem solving books

Competitive intelligence: how to acquire and use corporate intelligence and counter-intelligence

What do you actually learn about your rivals, and capability opponents? What are the genuine threats what you are promoting faces within the subsequent years? What do your opponents find out about you, how did they know about it and the way are you able to cease them checking out extra? in lots of methods the demanding situations and hazards confronted through smooth managers aren't that various from these which governments take care of.

Uncertain Data Envelopment Analysis

This publication is meant to offer the milestones within the development of doubtful information envelopment research (DEA). bankruptcy 1 offers a few easy advent to doubtful theories, together with chance concept, credibility thought, uncertainty idea and likelihood thought. bankruptcy 2 provides a finished evaluation and dialogue of simple DEA types.

Managerial Decision Making Leadership: The Essential Pocket Strategy Book

The fashionable supervisor faces a bewildering variety of demanding situations on daily basis. Their skill to make severe judgements, usually stressed, can without delay verify the long run good fortune of the corporate and their profession. it's for this reason miraculous that so few managers take some time to benefit the artwork of choice making.

Additional info for Naive Decision Making

Example text

As required. 3 (with card a red and cards B, C and D blue). 4 (i) Show that, if we have r red cards, b blue cards and g green cards (so we have n = r + b + g cards in all), then there are n! g! 40 The long run different ways of arranging them if cards of the same colour are indistinguishable. (ii) State and prove the general result for cards of many colours. The expression n n! (n − r )! r is very important in probability theory. 5 (i) Show that the coefficient of x n−r y r in the expansion of n (x + y)n is .

X c−x Then f (x) = − A B Bx 2 − A(c − x)2 + = 2 2 x (c − x) x 2 (c − x)2 so, if 0 < x < c, it follows that f (x) < 0 for Bx 2 < A(c − x)2 and f (x) > 0 for Bx 2 > A(c − x)2 . Thus f has a unique minimum for the range considered, which is attained when Bx 2 = A(c − x)2 , that is to say, when B 1/2 x = A1/2 (c − x). The required result follows. (ii) Without loss of generality, we may suppose i = 1 and k = 2, so 1/2 A w1 = 11/2 . w2 A2 28 A day at the races If we set A = A1 , B = A2 , x = w1 , y = w2 , c = w1 + w2 and A1/2 c B 1/2 c , w2∗ = 1/2 , 1/2 +B A + B 1/2 w1∗ = A1/2 then w1∗ , w2∗ > 0, w1∗ + w2∗ = c = w1 + w2 and, by part (ii), A2 A1 A2 A1 + > ∗ + ∗.

22 A day at the races then f (0) < 0. We also know that p 1 t1 p 2 t2 − 2 (t2 + Y )2 t1 p 1 t1 p 2 t2 > 2 − 2 t1 t2 p1 p2 = − ≥ 0. t1 t2 f (Y ) = Since f is strictly increasing and f (0) < 0 < f (Y ), there must be a unique y ∗ with 0 < y ∗ < Y and f (y ∗ ) = 0. It must be a minimum for f . If we translate back into terms of y1 and y2 , we see that we have proved our theorem. We asked how to bet last on a tote on a two-horse race in which there is a probability p j of the jth horse winning and t j has already been staked on that horse.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.61 of 5 – based on 32 votes